|
|
This section contains possible MAD clashes; however, due to the lack of peripheral letter or design transfer being seen on the host coin, they are not included as MAD clashes. If in the future these possible clashes show more evidence of being MAD clashes, they will be assigned a number and included in the LMC or appropriate section. |
 |
Seen to the left is 1991 where an arc appears through the date. The coin examined came from an LDS die that had abrasion meanwhile the coin had some plating issues; all make it hard to conclusively identify if and what type of clash this could be. An earlier MDS or EDS example should shed light on these marks. Coin courtesy Louis Schaeffer |
 |
This 1998P Lincoln cent shows a curved line running through the lower part of Lincoln's bust. While this may be the edge of the anvil die, there is no evidence of letter or design transfer which would make it a concrete MAD clash. However, there seems to be a similarity in the anomalies seen, in size , location and shape when compared to the next possible MAD clash discussed. (see next picture and comments) |
 |
This is a 1999P Lincoln cent that also shows a similar curved line as seen in the 1998P Lincoln cent which was discussed aboved. The similarities between the two anomalies indicate that a repetitious pattern maybe occurring. While this could be a MAD clash, more evidence is needed to confirm that classification.
Both of these coins are courtesy of Louis Schaeffer
|
 |
This is another 1999P Lincoln cent that shows a possible MAD clash on the obverse. However, with the absence of a design element clash mark other than the edge of the die, it cannot be verified as true MAD clash. |
 |
This 1993 Lincoln cent does show possibilities of having a radical misaligned die clash. However, the absence of identifying letter clashes from the reverse die puts it in the category of being a maybe.
The image to the left shows the arc mark (left by supposedly the rim of the reverse die).
This coin comes to us courtesy of Joe Koelling. |
|
|
|